Why it matters
The matrix replaces the spreadsheet of lender guidelines and the memory of whoever has been around longest. Every cell is explained, so a rep can tell a merchant why a lender is out, and a manager can see which lenders are close enough to ask for an exception.
Where it is
- 1Open a deal and go to the Lenders tab.
- 2The Lender matches card shows how many lender programs fit, when the deal was last evaluated, and five key facts (revenue, time in business, FICO, positions, amount).
- 3If some lenders need more data, a note lists what is missing and how many lenders are waiting on it. Fix those first.
- 4Use the tabs All, Eligible, Warnings, Needs data and Ineligible to filter.
The four results
| Group | Means |
|---|---|
| Eligible | Every hard rule passes and no soft rule fails. |
| Warnings | Every hard rule passes, but at least one soft rule fails (a preference is not met). |
| Needs data | No hard rule fails, but at least one hard rule could not be checked because a fact is unknown. |
| Ineligible | At least one hard rule fails. |
Rows are ranked by group, then by score, then by expected commission. Each row is one lender program, so the same lender can appear more than once.
Cells, score and chips
Columns are the criteria most lenders care about: Revenue, TIB, FICO, Positions, Amount, ADB, NSFs, Neg. days, Holdback, State and Industry. Under each header is the merchant's own value. Hover any cell for the rule, the lender's message and the gap.
- Green (Meets): the rule passes. Amber (Warning): a soft rule fails. Red (Fails): a hard rule fails. Gray (No data): the fact is unknown. A dash: the lender has no rule on it.
- Score (0 to 100): the share of soft-rule weight the deal passes (a soft rule with unknown data earns half). Once a lender has 3 or more decided submissions, 20% of the score is its approval rate. Example: 3 of 4 equal soft rules pass and 1 is unknown, so criteria are 3.5 of 4 = 87.5%; with a 60% approval rate the score is 0.8 x 87.5 + 0.2 x 60 = 82.
- `Near miss` chip: every hard fail is within tolerance (20 FICO points, 1 for counts, 2 months or 15% for time in business, 10% for money). Close enough to ask the lender for an exception.
- `Missing` chip: the facts this lender needs that the deal does not have yet.
- `up to $…` under the program name: the recommended maximum amount.
recommended max = lowest of: program (or lender) max amount max x monthly revenue x revenue (target holdback % x revenue - existing payments) x term months / factor rounded down to the nearest $500
Worked example: revenue $72,000, existing payments $4,620 a month, target 25%, program max $100,000, revenue multiple 1.25, term 120 to 240 days, factor 1.29 to 1.45. Payment room is 25% x 72,000 - 4,620 = $13,380 a month. The midpoint term is 180 days, about 5.92 months, and the midpoint factor 1.37, so 13,380 x 5.92 / 1.37 is about $57,800. The caps are $100,000, $90,000 and $57,800, so the matrix shows up to $57,500.
Selecting and submitting
- 1Tick the lenders you want, or click Select eligible to tick every Eligible and Warnings row.
- 2Click Submit to open the submission builder: Documents, then Lenders & recipients, then Email & submit.
- 3If you ticked an ineligible lender, step 2 shows a warning with the failed rules. Tick Submit anyway to that lender and type why (for example, the lender's rep approved an exception).
Submit anyway is on the record.
The CRM refuses an ineligible lender unless you confirm. When you do, the submission is flagged as submitted anyway, the failed rules and your reason are written to the audit log, and the deal timeline says so. Use it for real exceptions, not to skip the matrix.
Tips
- Matches refresh on their own when the deal, statements, positions or any lender's criteria change. The refresh button re-runs them now.
- Work the Needs data group before you submit: it often hides the best lender.
- A red cell on a lender you know funds this kind of deal usually means its criteria are out of date. Tell whoever maintains lenders.
Questions
Why is a lender listed twice in the match matrix?
Each active program of a lender is matched on its own, so a lender with an A-paper and a C-paper program appears once per program. A submission is still sent once per lender.
Try it in the app
Signed in? Open the screen this lesson covers.
Finished this lesson?
0 of 7 lessons in Underwriting and analysis
Progress is saved in this browser. Sign in to keep it across devices.
Related lessons
- Underwriting and analysisBuilding the deal profile the matcher readsEvery lender match is computed from one snapshot of the deal: merchant facts, owners, statements, positions and documents. What goes in and where you set it.
- Underwriting and analysisLender criteria and programsStore each lender's box as matching rules: quick criteria, programs with amount and factor ranges, hard and soft rules, OR groups and conditional rules.
- Sales rep playbookReading lender matches on a dealUse the deal's Lenders tab to see which lender programs fit, which are near misses worth an exception, and which just need one more piece of data.
- Lender matching and submissionsMatching a deal to the right three to five lendersWhy shotgunning a deal to every lender backfires, how to screen on hard and soft criteria, what to do with unknowns, and a worked example against four lenders.
- Help centerHow lender matching worksEvery deal is checked against the criteria of every active lender program of its product, with a pass, fail or unknown result per rule, a reason you can read, and whether the file is ready for that lender.
- Help centerSubmit a deal to lendersBuild one email per lender from your template, or a copy kit for lenders you submit to on their portal, attach the package, and track every response.